Uri Wealth Tax Cases
Uri Wealth Tax: Cases & Worked Examples
Illustrative computations showing how Uri’s very low wealth tax and communal multipliers work in practice. In many everyday situations, the annual charge is modest or even zero.
The canton of Uri is one of Switzerland’s lowest-wealth-tax jurisdictions. Wealth tax is levied at a comparatively low simple rate (around 1‰ of taxable net wealth), and this simple tax is multiplied by the cantonal and communal tax rates (Steuerfuss). In many communes, the combined rate for wealth tax ends up in the ≈ 2.0–2.4‰ range – roughly 0.20–0.24% of taxable net wealth.
At the same time, Uri grants generous deductions and allowances, so that modest levels of net wealth frequently generate no wealth tax at all or only a very small bill. Debts such as mortgages are fully taken into account, and pension assets (pillar 2 / pillar 3a) are excluded from the wealth tax base as in other cantons.
The examples below use a simplified planning model: we assume a 1.0‰ simple wealth tax on taxable net wealth and an indicative overall factor of ×2.2 (cantonal plus communal multiplier, without church tax) for typical communes such as Altdorf or Erstfeld. Real-world municipal factors vary and should always be checked against current Uri tax tables and the official calculator.
All numbers rounded; church tax ignored. Deductions and thresholds are simplified for planning illustration. For official computations, use the Uri tax calculator and cantonal tariff tables.
Case A — Single Professional in Altdorf
- Commune: Altdorf (cantonal capital; typical Uri tax level)
- Assets: CHF 600,000 (securities & cash)
- Liabilities: CHF 50,000 (consumer loan)
- Assumed allowance / shielded amount: ≈ CHF 200,000 (simplified)
| Gross assets | CHF 600,000 |
|---|---|
| Less liabilities | − CHF 50,000 |
| Net wealth | CHF 550,000 |
| Less allowance (simplified) | − CHF 200,000 |
| Taxable net wealth | CHF 350,000 |
| Simple wealth tax (1.0‰) | ≈ CHF 350 |
| Indicative Uri factor (Altdorf) | ≈ ×2.2 |
| Wealth tax due | ≈ CHF 770 |
| Effective rate (on net wealth) | ≈ 0.14% |
Case B — Married Couple with Children in Schattdorf
- Commune: Schattdorf (larger commune near Altdorf)
- Assets: CHF 1,800,000 (primary residence + investment portfolio)
- Liabilities: CHF 900,000 mortgage
- Filing status: Married, two children
- Assumed allowances / family deductions: ≈ CHF 400,000 (simplified)
| Gross assets | CHF 1,800,000 |
|---|---|
| Less liabilities (mortgage) | − CHF 900,000 |
| Net wealth | CHF 900,000 |
| Less family-related shields | − CHF 400,000 |
| Taxable wealth | CHF 500,000 |
| Simple wealth tax (1.0‰) | ≈ CHF 500 |
| Indicative Schattdorf factor | ≈ ×2.2 |
| Estimated wealth tax | ≈ CHF 1,100 |
| Effective rate (on net wealth) | ≈ 0.12% |
Case C — Entrepreneur with Holiday-Region Business (Andermatt)
- Commune: Andermatt (tourism-focused, slightly higher overall factor in some years)
- Unlisted shares: CHF 3,000,000 (local operating company)
- Other assets: CHF 500,000 (cash & securities)
- Liabilities: CHF 1,800,000 (business loans & mortgage)
- Filing status: Married, no children
- Assumed allowance / shielded amount: ≈ CHF 250,000 (simplified)
| Gross assets | CHF 3,500,000 |
|---|---|
| Less liabilities | − CHF 1,800,000 |
| Net wealth | CHF 1,700,000 |
| Less allowance | − CHF 250,000 |
| Taxable wealth | CHF 1,450,000 |
| Simple wealth tax (1.0‰) | ≈ CHF 1,450 |
| Indicative Andermatt factor | ≈ ×2.3 |
| Total wealth tax | ≈ CHF 3,335 |
| Effective rate (on net wealth) | ≈ 0.20% |
Private company shares are assumed to be valued under a standard practitioner method. In reality, specific reliefs or valuation adjustments may reduce the taxable base further.
Case D — Nonresident Owning Alpine Apartment in Realp
- Tax nexus: Nonresident with Uri property only
- Property value: CHF 900,000 (wealth tax value)
- Mortgage: CHF 650,000 (loan tied to the property)
- Commune: Realp (small alpine commune)
- Other Swiss assets: none
- Assumed allowance allocation: effectively small; simplified by ignoring personal allowance
| Swiss-situs net wealth (Uri) | CHF 250,000 |
|---|---|
| Allowance treatment | Ignored for simplicity (conservative) |
| Taxable Uri wealth | CHF 250,000 |
| Simple wealth tax (1.0‰) | ≈ CHF 250 |
| Indicative Realp factor | ≈ ×2.3 |
| Estimated wealth tax | ≈ CHF 575 |
| Effective rate on Swiss-situs wealth | ≈ 0.23% |
Case E — Comparison: Altdorf vs. Erstfeld vs. Low-Tax Commune
Single taxpayer with CHF 1,000,000 taxable net wealth (after allowances and debts)
| Altdorf | Erstfeld | Lower-tax commune (example) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple wealth tax (1.0‰ of CHF 1,000,000) | CHF 1,000 | ||
| Indicative total wealth tax factor | ≈ ×2.2 | ≈ ×2.4 | ≈ ×2.0 |
| Total wealth tax | ≈ CHF 2,200 | ≈ CHF 2,400 | ≈ CHF 2,000 |
| Effective rate (on taxable wealth) | ≈ 0.22% | ≈ 0.24% | ≈ 0.20% |
| Annual difference | Spread of only a few hundred francs per year between higher- and lower-tax communes at CHF 1m of taxable wealth | ||
Key Takeaways
- Uri is among the Swiss cantons with the lowest wealth tax burden.
- Indicative combined wealth tax rates are often just 0.20–0.24% of taxable net wealth, depending on the commune.
- Generous deductions and the exclusion of pension assets mean that many households pay little or no wealth tax.
- Mortgages and other debts reduce the wealth tax base one-to-one, making leverage a powerful planning lever for property owners.
- For entrepreneurs, Uri’s low rates make the annual carrying cost of business wealth comparatively modest.
- For nonresidents, only Uri-situs wealth is taxed; with typical debt levels, the resulting wealth tax is often small in the context of overall holding costs.
- Compared with other cantons, income tax planning usually dominates over wealth tax optimisation in Uri.
